Will AI Replace Your Job?

We scored every task in 341 occupations against AI products shipping today. Click any occupation to see exactly which tasks are changing and which companies are behind it.

Last updated November 12, 2026.

▶How we score occupations

1. Pull each occupation's core tasks from O*NET

O*NET defines 8–15 tasks per occupation, ranked by importance. We select the tasks that cover 80% of the role's importance weight.

2. Score each task against shipped AI products

Perplexity searches the web for commercially deployed AI systems — not research papers or demos — and scores each task on a 7-point scale. Every non-zero score must cite a named product, company, and source URL. This includes robotics and industrial automation alongside software AI — both are commercially deployed systems transforming how tasks are performed.

−3AI fully replaces the task−2AI leads, human checks−1AI handles major parts 0No meaningful AI impact+1AI assists the worker+2AI meaningfully augments the task+3AI enables entirely new capability

3. Classify into a tier based on depth of change

We count how many tasks are deeply changed by AI — meaning AI handles major parts, leads the work, or fundamentally transforms the workflow. The count determines the tier:

Replacing — AI is actively displacing workers. Evidence of headcount reduction or role elimination, combined with deep task displacement.

Reshaping — The job still exists, but tasks and workflows are fundamentally different. Four or more core tasks have been deeply changed by AI, whether through displacement or augmentation.

Augmenting — AI helps with some tasks, but the core work is the same. Workers use AI tools without their day-to-day fundamentally changing.

Minimal change — AI has not meaningfully affected this occupation's core tasks.

Inspired by Andrej Karpathy's framework.

▶What this tool does not cover
  • Demand elasticity. “Reshaping” does not mean fewer jobs. Software development is deeply reshaped by AI, but demand for developers may grow as each one becomes more productive.
  • Regulatory and social barriers. We score based on technical capability, not whether adoption is legally or socially likely. Health care, education, and law have significant barriers this tool does not model.
  • New jobs AI creates. We evaluate existing occupations. AI is also creating roles (prompt engineer, AI safety researcher) not yet in O*NET.
  • Local variation. AI adoption varies by employer, region, and industry. A cashier at a self-checkout chain faces different exposure than one at a local shop.
  • Speed of change. We measure current exposure, not a timeline. “Reshaping” may take a decade to fully play out.

This is a research tool, not a career prediction. Use it alongside your own judgment and local labor market data.

▶Full scoring pipeline (for researchers)

The methodology above is simplified. Here is the full pipeline for anyone who wants to reproduce or audit our results.

Task selection

For each occupation, we query the O*NET Web Services API for task statements, importance ratings (IM scale), and frequency ratings (FT scale). We select tasks covering 80% of cumulative importance weight, capped at 8–15 tasks. If importance/frequency data is unavailable, we fall back to all “Core” tasks.

AI research via Perplexity

Each occupation's task list is sent to Perplexity's sonar-pro model with pro search enabled and high search context. The prompt includes the 7-point rubric (−3 to +3), disambiguation hints (alternate job titles, workflow-specific search terms), and domain exclusions (O*NET, BLS, job boards). Perplexity returns a score, evidence quality rating, deployment scope, and core-output match for each task, plus a list of products and workforce signals.

Quality-adjusted scoring

Raw task scores are not used directly. Each task's contribution is adjusted by three factors: core output match (does the AI product perform the task's core output, or just adjacent admin?), deployment scope (pilot = 0.45× weight, industry standard = 1.0×), and evidence quality (weak = 0.55×, strong = 1.0×). This prevents pilot-stage or loosely-matched tools from inflating scores.

Tier classification

We count deep-change tasks: tasks scoring ±2 or higher, or labeled “AI handles major parts.” Four or more deep-change tasks triggers “Reshaping.” For “Replacement,” we also require evidence of actual workforce displacement (headcount reduction, role elimination) or a strongly negative overall score.

Validation

Research results that fail validation — hollow retrieval (no meaningful citations beyond O*NET/BLS), schema failures, or missing task coverage — are quarantined and excluded from the treemap. Occupations without valid research appear as “Score pending.”

The full source code for the scoring pipeline is available on request. If you find an error in a specific occupation's scoring, please let us know.

143.1M US jobs, scored by AI exposure

Based on 341 occupations mapped to real AI products

Key findings

  • 71% of tasks across 341 occupations already have a commercially deployed AI product — but only 39% are deeply changed.
  • For every worker in a replacement-tier job, 2.8 are in augmentation — 44.3M workers augmented vs. 15.8M in replacement.
  • Production is the most exposed sector — 54% replacement, 42% reshaping.
  • 96% of Computer & Math jobs are being reshaped. 0% are being replaced. The people building AI are the most changed by it.
  • Health care practitioners: 37 occupations, 9.3M jobs, zero in the replacement tier.
Metro views · Phoenix →

11% of the US workforce currently shows replacement-level AI exposure

OFFICE & ADMINISTRATIVETRANSPORTATION & MATERIAL MOVINGMANAGEMENTFOOD PREPARATION & SERVINGSALESHEALTHCARE PRACTITIONERSBUSINESS & FINANCIALPERSONAL CARE & SERVICEEDUCATION & LIBRARYCONSTRUCTION & EXTRACTIONPRODUCTIONINSTALLATION & MAINTENANCECOMPUTER & MATHBUILDING & GROUNDSHEALTHCARE SUPP…PROTECTIVE SE…ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERINGLIFE, PHYSICAL & SOCIAL SCIENCEARTS, DESIGN & MEDIACOMMUNITY & SOCIA…LEGALSecretaries andadministrative assistants0% · 3.5M jobsCustomer servicerepresentativesGeneral office clerksBookkeeping,accounting,…Information clerksMaterialrecording c…FinancialclerksReceptionistsHand laborers and materialmovers+4% · 7.0M jobsHeavy andtractor-trailertruck driversDeliverytruckdrivers…Material movi…Top executivesFinancial managersFarmers,…Computer…Sales ma…Medical a…Food and beverage servingand related workers+5% · 5.0M jobsCooksWaiters andwaitressesFood preparati…BartendersRetail sales workers0% · 4.2M jobsCashiersWholesale andmanufacturing s…Insura…Real e…Registered nursesPhysicia…License…Pharmac…Accountantsand auditorsManagement a…Project manage…Human resource…Market research…Home health and personalcare aides+17% · 4.3M jobsChildcare w…Barbers, hai…Kindergarten and ele…Postsecondary teac…High school t…Middle schoo…Special educ…Constructionlaborers and…Electrici…Construc…Plumber…Assemblers andfabricatorsMetal and pla…Generalmaintenance…Automotive s…Softwaredevelopers, qua…Computer suppo…Janitors andbuilding cleanersGroundsmaintenance…Nursingassistants a…Medica…Securityguards an…TeacherassistantsSocial…Social a…

Related

Looking specifically at health care? How AI Is Changing Health Care Jobs — an evidence-based analysis of AI exposure across 55 health care professions.